Addressing Ed Dingess’ Critique Of My Prevenient Grace Article

I recently was contacted by a theologian named Ed Dingess who runs the website www.reformedreasons.com letting me know that he had wrote a "refutation" of my Maximally Great Argument against…

Continue Reading Addressing Ed Dingess’ Critique Of My Prevenient Grace Article

The Maximally Great Argument Against Calvinism – Responding To Ed Dingess’ Follow Up Response

I wrote a blog post a couple of years ago titled "The Maximally Great Argument For Arminianism" which attempted to show that God's universal salvific will logically flows out of…

Continue Reading The Maximally Great Argument Against Calvinism – Responding To Ed Dingess’ Follow Up Response
Ed Dingess Responds To The Maximally Great Argument against Calvinism
God is love concept text lying on the rustic wooden background.

Ed Dingess Responds To The Maximally Great Argument against Calvinism

It seems that more Calvinists are becoming aware of my Maximally Great Argument Against Calvinism. The argument was formulated on my part out of a frustration to convince Calvinists that…

Continue Reading Ed Dingess Responds To The Maximally Great Argument against Calvinism

Jim Boucher Responds To The Maximally Great Argument Against Calvinism

The Maximally Great Argument Against Calvinism (here on abbreviated a MGAAC) attempts to show that the Arminian tenet of God's universal salvific will and unlimited atonement logically flow out of…

Continue Reading Jim Boucher Responds To The Maximally Great Argument Against Calvinism

Response to Bushey’s Critique Of My Prevenient Grace Article

I recently made an exception to my self imposed rule about not writing any posts about Calvinism when I wrote “What Biblical Evidence Is There For Prevenient Grace”. I did this because…

Continue Reading Response to Bushey’s Critique Of My Prevenient Grace Article